Case 26 2026: Dual-Hybrid Flap Advancement for Proximal Dorsal Nasal Reconstruction

Lukas Kure-Rosenberg; Magnus Balslev Avnstorp

Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery·Rapports de cas chirurgicaux en libre accès, évalués par les pairsÉvalué par les pairs · Libre accès

Case 26 2026: Dual-Hybrid Flap Advancement for Proximal Dorsal Nasal Reconstruction · JPBRS

Rapport de cas

Case 26 2026: Dual-Hybrid Flap Advancement for Proximal Dorsal Nasal Reconstruction

Lukas Kure-Rosenberg¹, Magnus Balslev Avnstorp¹

¹Department of Plastic- & Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark

Publié 28 mai 2026174 vues6 min de lecture

Exporter :RIS BibTeX

Résumé

Background: Proximal dorsal nasal defects are commonly reconstructed with glabellar advancement flaps. However, in selected patients with favorable distal tissue mobility, alternative local strategies may provide equivalent reconstruction while preserving aesthetic subunits thus minimizing scar burden. Case Presentation: An 84-year-old male underwent oncologic excision of a 13-mm moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the proximal nasal dorsum. The resulting full-thickness defect extended toward the nasal bulb. Preoperative assessment showed significant bulbous skin mobility and distal redundancy without prior surgical scarring. Methods: Instead of glabellar recruitment, reconstruction was performed with a hybrid local advancement strategy combining Peng-inspired medialization with a limited Rintala/H-type advancement component. Tissue was mobilized in the subcutaneous plane to preserve the subdermal plexus, and distal advancement was maintained lateral to the midline to protect dorsal contour symmetry. Results: Flap perfusion remained stable, with no ischemia or venous congestion. At the two-month follow-up, the patient showed a preserved dorsal contour, symmetrical nasal lines, and satisfactory scar placement, without trapdoor deformity or tip distortion. Conclusion: Selected proximal dorsal nasal defects can be reconstructed with hybrid local advancement techniques that strategically exploit distal tissue redundancy. Context-driven modification of established flap principles may allow avoidance of glabellar flaps while maintaining excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes. Patient medical history An 84-year-old male was referred to the Department of Plastic Surgery at Roskilde Sealand University Hospital, Denmark, in winter 2025 by a dermatologi

Points clés à retenir

Conseils pratiques

• Not all proximal dorsal nasal defects require glabellar recruitment. Assess distal mobility before defaulting to glabellar recruitment (ref 5)
• Bulbous nasal skin may offer underutilized advancement potential (ref 6, 7)
• Combining Peng-type medialization with limited Rintala/H-flap advancement allows precise tension control and modulates tension distribution (ref 8, 9)
• Maintaining distal advancement lateral to the midline helps preserve dorsal aesthetic lines (ref 10)
• Novelty in nasal reconstruction often lies in strategic recombination, not in new flap invention (ref 11, 12)

Écueils

• Large defects and limited undermining when using a classic Rintala flap, can cause vertical tension vectors and subsequent tip elevation (ref 13)
• Limited advancement and secondary wound tension can lead to trapdoor deformity and hypertrophic scarring (ref 14)

Patient history

An 84-year-old male was referred to the Department of Plastic Surgery at Roskilde Sealand University Hospital, Denmark, in winter 2025 by a dermatologist for evaluation of a lesion on the dorsal nose. Following the establishment of a middle-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) diagnosis via biopsy, it was deemed necessary for surgical hospital-based treatment. The patient had no history of tobacco use or alcohol abuse.

Examination

The SCC of the nasal dorsum measured 12 mm in diameter. Preoperative assessment demonstrated tumor mobility, significant skin redundancy, and mobility of the nasal bulb, with preserved tissue quality and laxity lateral to the distal portion of the defect. The surrounding skin was free of prior surgical scars (Figure 1).

Pre-operative considerations

Introduction:
Reconstruction of proximal dorsal nasal defects remains technically demanding because of limited tissue availability, competing tension vectors, and the risk of contour distortion across aesthetic subunits. The glabellar advancement flap has long been considered a reliable workhorse for upper dorsal defects, offering robust vascularity and predictable advancement. However, glabellar recruitment inevitably violates the glabellar subunit and may introduce vertical scarring, brow distortion, or altered dorsal contour in selected patients.

The Rintala flap, originally described as a midline dorsal advancement flap for upper nasal defects, represents a transverse advancement concept that utilizes laxity of the nasal dorsum while preserving subunit integrity (ref 1). The technique allows recruitment of tissue from the proximal dorsum through wide subcutaneous undermining. Despite its conceptual simplicity and reliable outcomes in appropriately selected cases, the Rintala is less frequently reported in contemporary series. This decline may reflect the increasing popularity of bilobed and transposition flaps, as well as concerns about limited potential for advancement and the risk of tension-related dorsal flattening in larger defects.

More recently, the Peng flap has gained recognition as a versatile advancement-rotation concept for distal and mid-dorsal defects (ref 2). By combining bilateral advancement with medial rotation, the Peng flap redistributes tension vectors while preserving the dorsal aesthetic lines. Its strength lies in controlled medialization without central distortion, particularly in patients with bulbous or redundant distal nasal skin.

Both Rintala and Peng concepts share a fundamental principle: tension redistribution through strategic local advancement rather than distant tissue recruitment. However, their application to proximal dorsal defects remains selectively described. In patients with favorable distal tissue mobility, hybridization of these established principles may provide an alternative to glabellar advancement while preserving midline symmetry and dorsal contour (ref 3).

The present case illustrates how context-driven recombination of Rintala-type transverse advancement with 180-degree Peng-inspired medialization can facilitate reconstruction of a proximal dorsal defect without glabellar recruitment.

Pre-Operative Considerations:
Perioperative frozen-guided excision with a 7-mm margin resulted in a relatively large full-thickness defect on the proximal dorsum nasi, extending toward the nasal bulb. The defect reached the perichondrium of the upper lateral cartilage, with no evidence of residual disease in any of the frozen histology sections (Figure 2). The patient was scheduled for flap reconstruction in the same session.

Références

Rintala AE, Asko-Seljavaara S. Reconstruction of midline skin defects of the nose. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):105-8. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036701. PMID: 4924039.
Deluca J, Tappeiner L, Pichler M, Eisendle K. Using the Peng flap for a wide dorsal nasal defect. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Nov;12(11):1060-2. English, German. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12360. Epub 2014 Aug 18. PMID: 25135801.
Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction–beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1405-16; discussion 1417-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138596.57393.05. PMID: 15509926.
Baker, S.R., Ed. (2014) Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction. 3rd Ed., Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia.
Burget GC. Aesthetic restoration of the nose. Clin Plast Surg. 1985 Jul;12(3):463-80. PMID: 3893849.
Peng VT, Sturm RL, Marsh TW. “Pinch modification” of the linear advancement flap. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1987 Mar;13(3):251-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1987.tb03946.x. PMID: 3546432.
Rowe D, Warshawski L, Carruthers A. The Peng flap. The flap of choice for the convex curve of the central nasal tip. Dermatol Surg. 1995 Feb;21(2):149-52. PMID: 7894933.
Onishi K, Okada E, Hirata A. The Rintala flap: a versatile procedure for nasal reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 20. PMID: 25053186.
Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction–beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1405-16; discussion 1417-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138596.57393.05. PMID: 15509926.
Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985 Aug;76(2):239-47. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198508000-00010. PMID: 4023097.
Menick FJ. Practical details of nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):613e-630e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182827bb3. PMID: 23542280.
Austin GK, Shockley WW. Reconstruction of nasal defects: contemporary approaches. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Oct;24(5):453-60. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000295. PMID: 27428293; PMCID: PMC5077171.
Onishi K, Okada E, Hirata A. The Rintala flap: a versatile procedure for nasal reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 20. PMID: 25053186.

Comment citer cet article

Cas similaires

Case 26 2026: Dual-Hybrid Flap Advancement for Proximal Dorsal Nasal Reconstruction

Résumé

Points clés à retenir

Patient history

Examination

Pre-operative considerations

Références

Case 20 2026: Staged Excision and Delayed Primary Closure of a large Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Anterior Scalp

Case 22 2026: Superior Gluteal vessel: A rarely used recipient for free flap reconstruction of lumbosacral defects: a case report.

Case 23 2026: “Minimally Invasive Finger Amputation Using a Volar ‘Toilet seat’ Flap for Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma”

Étape 1 — Step 1: Preoperative Assessment

Étape 2 — Step 2: Excision of tumor and marking of the the Dual-Hybrid flap design.

Étape 3 — Step 3: Flap incision and mobilization

Étape 4 — Step 4: Flap suturing

Étape 5

Étape 6

Post-operative plan

Pearls

Pitfalls