Case 17 2026: Papilla Reconstruction Using the Tennessee Flap Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Mikkel Halborg Sørensen; Nanja Gotland Sundstrup; Christian Lyngsaa Lang

Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery·Peer-reviewed, open-access surgical case reportsPeer-reviewed · Open access

Case 17 2026: Papilla Reconstruction Using the Tennessee Flap Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction · JPBRS

Case report

Case 17 2026: Papilla Reconstruction Using the Tennessee Flap Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Mikkel Halborg Sørensen¹, Nanja Gotland Sundstrup¹, Christian Lyngsaa Lang¹

¹Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark

Published May 28, 2026386 views5 min read

Export:RIS BibTeX

Abstract

A 50-year-old woman with a history of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) underwent right-sided papilla reconstruction following secondary deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. A Tennessee flap technique was used in conjunction with correction of lateral volume of the DIEP flap. The technique provided projection and predictable positioning relative to the contralateral nipple-areola complex. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting. The immediate postoperative appearance was satisfactory, and wound healing proceeded without complications. This case higlights the continued utility of the Tennessee flap as a simple, safe, and reproducible technique for delayed nipple reconstruction. Patient medical history A 50-year-old woman with a history of IDC underwent right-sided subcutaneous mastectomy in 2017. In 2025, she underwent unilateral delayed autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap. In 2026, completion of the reconstructive process was planned with papilla reconstruction. The patient was in good general health, non-smoking, and without known comorbidities. Before and After Patient examination Clinical examination demonstrated a well-integrated right-sided DIEP flap, good symmetry compared to the contralateral breast, even though the flap was too voluminous at the lateral side. Absence of nipple-areola complex (NAC) on the reconstructed side and a contralateral areola with soft and not sharply demarcated borders. A well-healed lower abdominal donor-site scar from the DIEP flap harvest was present. Pre-operative considerations In Denmark, the Tennessee

Key learning points

Pearls

Determine nipple position with the patient upright.
Overcorrect projection of the nipple intraoperatively (up to 20–30%) to compensate for predictable long-term contraction and dermal remodeling.
Preserve maximal dermal thickness during flap elevation to maintain subdermal plexus perfusion and structural rigidity of the neo-papilla. Flap base width must be sufficient to preserve random-pattern perfusion.
Minimize circumferential skin tension at closure, as external compressive forces accelerate projection loss.
Perform simultaneous minor contour corrections cautiously, ensuring they do not compromise the vascular base of the flap.
Planned areola tattooing reduces the visual impact of adjacent scars.
The flap should be designed away from prior scar lines to avoid compromised microvascularity.

Pitfalls

-tLong-term loss of projection due to flap contraction should be anticipated.
-tThe height of the neo-nipple may initially be adequate for symmetry, but over time can shrink.
-tFlap design too close to previous scars may compromise vascularity.
-tInadequate patient counseling regarding expected projection loss may result in dissatisfaction.
-tFlap on flap, important to ensure dimensions to supply sufficient dermal perfusion.

Patient history

A 50-year-old woman with a history of IDC underwent right-sided subcutaneous mastectomy in 2017. In 2025, she underwent unilateral delayed autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap. In 2026, completion of the reconstructive process was planned with papilla reconstruction. The patient was in good general health, non-smoking, and without known comorbidities.

Examination

Clinical examination demonstrated a well-integrated right-sided DIEP flap, good symmetry compared to the contralateral breast, even though the flap was too voluminous at the lateral side. Absence of nipple-areola complex (NAC) on the reconstructed side and a contralateral areola with soft and not sharply demarcated borders. A well-healed lower abdominal donor-site scar from the DIEP flap harvest was present.

Pre-operative considerations

In Denmark, the Tennessee flap, a modification of the classic C-H flap (named for its C- and H-shaped incision pattern), is frequently used for nipple reconstruction.1 It is a random-pattern dermal flap valued for its simplicity, reproducibility, and suitability for outpatient surgery under local anesthesia. Unlike graft-augmented techniques, projection is achieved solely through folded dermis, rendering long-term nipple height dependent on scar maturation and dermal remodeling. Intraoperative overcorrection of nipple projection by approximately 20–30% is therefore recommended, as projection loss up to 38 % has been reported at one year.2 In the present case, the DIEP flap skin envelope was soft and pliable. These factors reduced the risk of vascular compromise and excessive fibrosis. The lateral fullness allowed for simultaneous contour refinement without altering central flap perfusion.
The Tennessee flap consists of a centrally based rectangular dermal segment with two lateral wings. The central limb forms the core of the neo-papilla, while the wings provide circumferential support. Elevation is performed in the subdermal plane with preservation of dermal thickness to maintain perfusion from the subdermal plexus. In DIEP-flap reconstructed breasts, excessive undermining should be avoided to protect perforator-dependent perfusion.
Projection is achieved by folding the central limb and approximating the lateral wings with deep dermal sutures, thereby creating a scar-supported dermal cylinder without internal reinforcement. Tension-free closure is essential, as circumferential compression accelerates projection loss. Although the technique produces two adjacent scars and gradual shrinkage over time, these were considered acceptable in this case and are expected to be camouflaged by subsequent areola tattooing. Nipple position was determined with the patient in the standing position using a temporary nipple template to achieve optimal three-dimensional symmetry with the contralateral breast.

References

Yoo H, Park S, Chang H. Nipple reconstruction using modified C-V flap with purse-string sutures for maintenance of long-term nipple projection. Journal of Plastic, Recon-structive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2023;84:62-70. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.061
Yoon JS, Chang JW, Ahn HC, Chung MS. Modified C-H flap for simultaneous nipple reconstruction during autologous breast reconstruction: Surgical tips for safety and cosmesis. Medicine (United States). 2018;97(38). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012460