Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery·经同行评审的开放获取外科病例报告同行评审 · 开放获取
Ajla Sabitovic, Nanja Gotland Sundstrup. Case 04 2026: Full-Thickness Skin Graft for Areola Reconstruction: A Simple and Reliable Technique. Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery. 2026.
开放获取。 © 2026 作者。由Journal of Plastic, Breast & Reconstructive Surgery发表。本病例版权由作者与期刊共同持有；作者可将自己的病例用于教育、演讲及社交媒体。
继续阅读
Ajla Sabitovic, Nanja Gotland Sundstrup
This case describes the use of full-thickness skin graft for reconstruction of areola in a 64-year-old woman following right-sided mastectomy and delayed breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap. The patient preferred autologous reconstruction and declined tattooing or additional donor-site scars. Due to the light pigmentation on the contralateral areola, it was decided to shave the skin off as a full-thickness in the affected area, and let the following scaring in the area lead to a little change in pigmentation and contration. This approach avoided additional scarring while achieving an acceptable aesthetic result. Patient medical history A 64-year-old woman with a history of right-sided breast cancer underwent mastectomy in November 2022. In August 2024, the patient received a breast reconstruction with a free DIEP flap and a contralateral breast reduction. Nipple reconstruction using af full-thickness skin graft was subsequently performed in March 2025. In October 2025, the patient underwent areola reconstruction with a full-thickness skin graft on the reconstructed breast, combining the donor and recipient site around the nipple. Before and After Patient examination Clinical examination revealed aesthetically pleasing results following the DIEP flap and papil reconstruction as well as a light-colored contralateral areola. Pre-operative considerations It was considered to use a skin-graft from the groin due to its darker pigmentation, but the patient didn’t want any additional scares. Due to the light pigmentation on the contralateral areola, a local full-thickness skin graft was harvested at the recipient site. Postoperative scarring was expected to provide mild pigmentation change and contraction to improve areola definition. 1 Step 1 Preoperative markings performed with the patient in a standing position, showing the neo
1. Three-dimensional reconstruction potential.
2. Durability.
3. This technique is straight forward and well-suited for outpatient or clinical settings.
4. No additional scars are created.
5. Donor site morbidity is minimal.
1. Surgical procedure compared with tattooing.
2. Donor/recipient site morbidity
BeforeAfterA 64-year-old woman with a history of right-sided breast cancer underwent mastectomy in November 2022. In August 2024, the patient received a breast reconstruction with a free DIEP flap and a contralateral breast reduction. Nipple reconstruction using af full-thickness skin graft was subsequently performed in March 2025. In October 2025, the patient underwent areola reconstruction with a full-thickness skin graft on the reconstructed breast, combining the donor and recipient site around the nipple.
Clinical examination revealed aesthetically pleasing results following the DIEP flap and papil reconstruction as well as a light-colored contralateral areola.
It was considered to use a skin-graft from the groin due to its darker pigmentation, but the patient didn’t want any additional scares. Due to the light pigmentation on the contralateral areola, a local full-thickness skin graft was harvested at the recipient site. Postoperative scarring was expected to provide mild pigmentation change and contraction to improve areola definition.
Preoperative markings performed with the patient in a standing position, showing the neoareola outlined 10 mm from the neopapilla corresponding to the size of the contralateral areola.
Preoperative image obtained with the patient in a supine position.
2
After the administration of local anesthesia (1% lidocain with adrenalin), incisions were made according to the preoperative markings around the neopapilla.
3
The skin was carefully harvested as a full-thickness graft for subsequent transplantation. Hemostasis was performed.
4
The image shows the donorsite of the full-thickness skin graft, as well as the harvested full-thickness skin graft.
5
The harvested full-thickness skin graft placed on the recipient site, forming a donut-like shape around the neopapilla.
6
The outer linning of the full-thickness graft was sutured with nylon 5-0.
7
The image shows the suturing of the inner linning of the full-thickness graft around the neopapilla with nylon 5-0 and the final postoperative result.
8
The result 10 days postoperative.
9
The postoperative result after 3 months.
10
The patient was advised to maintain restricted activity regimen until suture removal 10 days postoperatively. A three month follow-up was scheduled.
1. Three-dimensional reconstruction potential.
2. Durability.
3. This technique is straight forward and well-suited for outpatient or clinical settings.
4. No additional scars are created.
5. Donor site morbidity is minimal.
1. Surgical procedure compared with tattooing.
2. Donor/recipient site morbidity
