Keywords: Nasal reconstruction, plastic, surgery, tumor reconstruction, rieger-marchac
Authors: Anonymised for the Case Competition 2025
Abstract
Reconstructing the nasal tip and lower third defects after neoplasm excision is challenging due to the nose’s complex structure. We present an 82-year-old man with basal cell carcinoma at the nasal tip-alar junction. Following surgical excision with a 3mm margin, the full-thickness defect was reconstructed using the Rieger-Marchac dorsal nasal flap. This technique effectively restores nasal form and function while ensuring optimal aesthetic outcomes, making it a reliable approach for nasal defect repair.
Patient medical history
Hypertension, diabetic mellitus, bronchial asthma, recent history of burrhole and drainage of subdural haemorrhage post fall and chronic smoker.


Before and After
Patient examination
He presented with hyperpigmented lesions at the junction between nasal tip and the right alar of the nose for more than 10 years. It was initially a small mole like lesion which increase in size progressively in past 1 year. It was also associated with contact bleeding (Figure 1). The 2.0 x 2.0cm infiltrative, pearly lesion extended from right nasal supratip to the right alar groove. No evidence of transnasal involvement however ulceration was observed
Pre-operative considerations
Patient evaluation includes medical history to assess comorbidities like smoking that may affect healing

The surgical defect
The surgical resection created a full-thickness defect that involved the half of nasal tip, soft triangle, nasal lobule and distal part of dorsum. The donor site flap was designed and marked

Flap raised
The flap was raised starting at the flap edge at the subcutaneous plane, then deepened to submuscular plane to include muscle perforator from the angular vessels. The flap was designed in such a way that the medial edge is thin to contour at the medial epicanthal and side wall to reduce the pincushioning effect and achieve less visible scar

Flap sutured
The flap was then rotated to cover the defect and sutured

Post suturing of flap
Lateral view with passive penrose drain

6 weeks postoperatively
Anterior view

6 weeks postoperatively
Lateral view

6 months postoperatively
Anterior view
Patient was happy and satisfied with outcome and defaulted follow up
Photo was sent by patient via WhatsApp
Pearls
Pitfalls
Post-operative plan
Flap Monitoring: Check colour, capillary refill, and temperature every few hours. Venous congestion (dark, sluggish, swollen flap) → Consider gentle massage or suture release.
References
- Gillies HD. Plastic surgery of the face. London: Oxford Medical Publishers, 1920
- Rieger, R A. “A local flap for repair of the nasal tip.” Plastic and reconstructive surgery vol. 40,2 (1967): 147-9. doi:10.1097/00006534-196708000-00005
- Marchac, D, and B Toth. “The axial frontonasal flap revisited.” Plastic and reconstructive surgery vol. 76,5 (1985): 686-94. doi:10.1097/00006534-198511000-00006
- Zavod, Meghan B et al. “The dorsal nasal flap.” Dermatologic clinics vol. 23,1 (2005): 73-85, vi. doi:10.1016/j.det.2004.09.012
- Zimbler, M S, and J R Thomas. “The dorsal nasal flap revisited: aesthetic refinements in nasal reconstruction.” Archives of facial plastic surgery vol. 2,4 (2000): 285-6. doi:10.1001/archfaci.2.4.285
- M.Nasretal./InternationalJournalofMedicalReviewsandCaseReports(2020)4(6):90-91
- Losco, Luigi et al. “Reconstruction of the Nose: Management of Nasal Cutaneous Defects According to Aesthetic Subunit and Defect Size. A Review.” Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) vol. 56,12 639. 25 Nov. 2020, doi:10.3390/medicina56120639
- Bitgood, Mark J, and C Patrick Hybarger. “Expanded applications of the dorsal nasal flap.” Archives of facial plastic surgery vol. 9,5 (2007): 344-51. doi:10.1001/archfaci.9.5.344
- Jena, Amitabh et al. “Reconstruction with DorsaNasal Flap after Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Nose.” Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery vol. 10,1 (2017): 54-55. doi:10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_128_15
- Wright, Byron E et al. “Dorsal nasal flap for nasal reconstruction: the alternate forehead flap.” Ear, nose, & throat journal vol. 85,11 (2006): 710, 713